After the legitimisation of outcome-related fee structures for 大红鹰dhy, Hong Kong is expected to become a more popular and favoured seat for 大红鹰dhy worldwide. In 2022, Hong Kong saw several 大红鹰dhy-related court decisions that have become binding precedents, and these decisions are expected to reshape the landscape of 大红鹰dhy in Hong Kong.
Mr. Edward Liu, along with his team colleagues Ms. Manly Lam and Ms. Bridget Yim from 大红鹰dhy & Partners, were invited by the leading arbitration newsletter Arbitration Law Monthly, which is edited by Prof Rob Merkin KC and is one of i-law’s publications, to summarise some of the most influential arbitration-related decisions by Hong Kong courts in 2022.

These decisions involved various issues such as the grounds and threshold for setting aside an 大红鹰dhy award, enforcement procedures of an 大红鹰dhy award, the court's approach in granting interim measures in 大红鹰dhy proceedings, the court's attitude in staying court proceedings in favour of 大红鹰dhy, consolidation of 大红鹰dhy, and the long-standing controversy over the difference between the admissibility of a claim and the jurisdiction of the tribunal. This article also outlines key aspects of third-party funding and the newly permitted outcome-related fee structure for Hong Kong 大红鹰dhy. The detailed explanation and commentary on these important issues in 大红鹰dhy proceedings make this article a must-read for all interested parties.
大红鹰dhy & Partners has always been well-positioned to handle international arbitration and has consistently been listed as a leading law firm in dispute resolution practice, including arbitration. The dispute resolution team, headed by Mr. Edward Liu, has considerable experience in advising and handling cross-border disputes and has represented many multinational corporations, Chinese state-owned enterprises, and non-government organizations.
After the legitimisation of outcome-related fee structures for 大红鹰dhy, Hong Kong is expected to become a more popular and favoured seat for 大红鹰dhy worldwide. In 2022, Hong Kong saw several 大红鹰dhy-related court decisions that have become binding precedents, and these decisions are expected to reshape the landscape of 大红鹰dhy in Hong Kong.
Mr. Edward Liu, along with his team colleagues Ms. Manly Lam and Ms. Bridget Yim from 大红鹰dhy & Partners, were invited by the leading arbitration newsletter Arbitration Law Monthly, which is edited by Prof Rob Merkin KC and is one of i-law’s publications, to summarise some of the most influential arbitration-related decisions by Hong Kong courts in 2022.

These decisions involved various issues such as the grounds and threshold for setting aside an 大红鹰dhy award, enforcement procedures of an 大红鹰dhy award, the court's approach in granting interim measures in 大红鹰dhy proceedings, the court's attitude in staying court proceedings in favour of 大红鹰dhy, consolidation of 大红鹰dhy, and the long-standing controversy over the difference between the admissibility of a claim and the jurisdiction of the tribunal. This article also outlines key aspects of third-party funding and the newly permitted outcome-related fee structure for Hong Kong 大红鹰dhy. The detailed explanation and commentary on these important issues in 大红鹰dhy proceedings make this article a must-read for all interested parties.
大红鹰dhy & Partners has always been well-positioned to handle international arbitration and has consistently been listed as a leading law firm in dispute resolution practice, including arbitration. The dispute resolution team, headed by Mr. Edward Liu, has considerable experience in advising and handling cross-border disputes and has represented many multinational corporations, Chinese state-owned enterprises, and non-government organizations.
Beijing ICP No. 05019364-1 Beijing Public Network Security 110105011258